V8 Lady Posted December 25, 2016 Report Share Posted December 25, 2016 This article was shared by Gary Stretton on FB - delighted to see that Shell have realised how much we all struggle with fuel issues including ethanol - worth a read. https://news.classiccars.com/shell-develops-new-premium-fuel-engines-old-cars/ Happy Christmas one and all - ours is very quite with Alec unable to chat and not up too any visitors. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 25, 2016 Report Share Posted December 25, 2016 First: Merry Christmas to you and Alec! It's good to see that a big name like Shell is formulating a classic friendly fuel. However, this is a lot of marketing and show going on for something that's pretty readily available on the continent... In Germany there's Aral and in Holland we have Firezone with 102 RON Ethanol free fuel. Luckily for me, Firezone is selling the 'Competition 102' only 300m from my home, making classic life easy. Some info here: http://competition102.com/en/ On the other hand, it is good to see that a major company regards the classic car scene as a Market (capital M) and not something that's an appendix on their Annual Report for shareholders. Mind you, a lot of classic cars are sold and bought for enormous sums of money by people who can influence the oil company's boardroom. Perhaps these weird prices have a positive side effect. M Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Down Posted December 25, 2016 Report Share Posted December 25, 2016 V8 Lady, All the very best to Alec, yourself and your family for Xmas and the New Year. I always appreciate his erudite offerings on the Forum and look forward to many more in 2017. Cheers Paul Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GT6M Posted December 25, 2016 Report Share Posted December 25, 2016 All this stuff aboot re moving carbon, = sheite carbon cannot be broken doon wid stuff thats in petrol , carbons stuff diamonds are med frae. but what this stuff can doo, is remove the softer tarry stuff thats stik,n t,valves an pistons which most decent fuels already have A way t,get alot of the stuff oot yer cyl heed, is to trickle water thru yer manifold the water turns t,steam, an blasts the stuff off. any one ever took a cyl heed of where water was seeping in, due t,gasget going then yel see its spotless. an water aint got any cleaners or modifyers bung into it M Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Cobbold Posted December 25, 2016 Report Share Posted December 25, 2016 Happy Christmas Diane and Alec. Fat chance of super fuels coming this way, the nearest 97RON to me is a hour's round trip. So I'm building water injection for lots and lots of RON. No shortage of water hereabouts ! There used to be a bolt-on kit for steam injection. Once saw one on a 6. The steam removes carbon deposits. Windscreen washer pump, switiched on at full throttle, copper coil wrapped round exhaust, 'nozzle' in each carb mouth. Simples. Peter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Happy Christmas Diane and Alec. Fat chance of super fuels coming this way, the nearest 97RON to me is a hour's round trip. So I'm building water injection for lots and lots of RON. No shortage of water hereabouts ! There used to be a bolt-on kit for steam injection. Once saw one on a 6. The steam removes carbon deposits. Windscreen washer pump, switiched on at full throttle, copper coil wrapped round exhaust, 'nozzle' in each carb mouth. Simples. Peter Is that the same sort of system Saab used during the 80s/90s for the 99 and 900? So called Water Injection? On the other hand, these cars were 'turbo'ed' and ran with fuel injection. Wikipedia tells me that it was water & methanol (50/50) and that it's becoming 'en vogue' again on diesel engines to steam clean the EGR valve. Menno Quote Link to post Share on other sites
john.r.davies Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 (edited) The last word on steam injection has to go to well known messiah and lizard fancier, David Icke: https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=161241 Your post made me search for such technology, which how I came upon the reptilian conspi-racist's opinions, and made me even more sceptical. This video, extolling steam injection on a Saab is the worst-lit I've ever seen, and ends with the proud exhibition of water injected as "steam". At least it shows that such a system must be a bit more complicated than your - clearly simplified - description, Peter! Water injected could and has cooled overheated turboed engines, by absorbing heat of vaporisation, by being ng converted to steam, and, we are told, can clean mucky engines. But added performance? Run on low octane fuel? Noun Edited December 26, 2016 by john.r.davies Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RogerH Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Hi John, it does work but not necessarily for the right reasons. Have a look here and scroll down to 'use on aircraft engines' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_injection_(engine)#Use_in_aircraft Water and water methanol were used up to the mid/late 70's on the TRident fleet Roger Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Cobbold Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 (edited) The heyday of water injection in piston engines was in WWII. It is a potent antidetonant, and can add 10 octane points to 97RON. It works by cooling the mixture charge, mainly during the compression stroke, and slowing combustion. My approach and water flow estimates are here: https://supertrarged.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/tr6se-28-water-injection/ The main challenge is getting equal distribution of droplets between cylinders https://supertrarged.wordpress.com/2014/11/22/tr6se-29-distribution-of-injected-water/ Effect of WI on combustion: https://supertrarged.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/tr6se36-water-injection-effects-on-combustion-pdf.pdf Havent written up the nuts and bolts yet, but its a bitsa with simple on-off control , a window cleaner's 150psi pump, and a couple of Bete PJ impingement atomisers: http://www.spray-nozzle.co.uk/spray-nozzles/fog-misting-nozzles/impingement Surprisng the racers haven't picked up on WI: they could resurrect those 12'5:1 compression heads that became useless when avgas was outlawed and pump fuels specified in the regs. Peter Edited December 26, 2016 by Peter Cobbold Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Cobbold Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 (edited) Is that the same sort of system Saab used during the 80s/90s for the 99 and 900? So called Water Injection? On the other hand, these cars were 'turbo'ed' and ran with fuel injection. Wikipedia tells me that it was water & methanol (50/50) and that it's becoming 'en vogue' again on diesel engines to steam clean the EGR valve. Menno Menno, The kit I saw on a LHD import 6 looked 1970s vintage, definitely aftermarket. I havent seen the SAAB system but I'd expect them to inject water just after the turbo to give droplets the longest possible time to break up before the inlet valves.And to switch on injection according to boost - as that is when knock needs to be killed. WI is coming back today, with Bosch offering a system. https://techxplore.com/news/2016-09-bosch-fuel-saving-bonus.html WI allows higher compression ratios to be used with pump fuel, and that higher CR reduces fuel consumption at cruise. WI will be on only at wide open throttle. BMW are going one step more complex with direct in cylinder WI: http://www.bmwblog.com/2015/07/02/bmw-1-series-with-direct-water-injection-first-drive/ Peter Edited December 26, 2016 by Peter Cobbold Quote Link to post Share on other sites
john.r.davies Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Thank you, Roger, Peter. You and an older (than us!) generation of engineers were ahead. John Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveR Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 The FW190 used the system. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Peter, does this helps? http://www.vehicular.isy.liu.se/Publications/PhD/99_PhD_580_LE.pdf I own a Saab 96 and are member of the Dutch Saab forum. It's an ongoing discussion on the forum - more or less an academic one... I didn't find a thread about a working 'specimen'. There's a link to the site above, especially from page 95 and on, I think. Since you're used reading this intelligent stuff, perhaps you use it. Menno Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malcolm Tatton Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 (edited) I still have the DIY steam injection kit that I bought in the 70's probably from an ad in E&M.It has a water storage tank, a pump to a header tank which is mounted at the same level as the exhaust manifold, and a pair of 'steam generators' which are long bolts, drilled lenghwise through the centre and intended to be fitted through the manifold and sealed with a couple of copper washers.Never fitted it and keep it near to tbe Smiths computerised fuel display, also bought and never fitted Edited December 26, 2016 by Malcolm T Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Don H. Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Yes, water injection for anti-knock is old tech. One of the more notable water injection systems was that fitted to the Oldsmobile F-85 Jetfire engines in the early 1960s, where a distilled water + methanol mix was injected into a high compression turbocharged engine to control detonation. It worked technically but the gains weren't enough to justify the costs and maintenance issues back in the day. Note that the block went on to win two F1 championships for Brabham as the Repco 3.0 litre, and the basic design for that 215 in³ aluminum v8 engine was later sold on to the British who used it for a few years. There were even DIY kits sold in the back pages of car magazines and through catalog companies like JC Whitney. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Clarkey Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Happy Christmas Diane and Alec. Fat chance of super fuels coming this way, the nearest 97RON to me is a hour's round trip. So I'm building water injection for lots and lots of RON. No shortage of water hereabouts ! There used to be a bolt-on kit for steam injection. Once saw one on a 6. The steam removes carbon deposits. Windscreen washer pump, switiched on at full throttle, copper coil wrapped round exhaust, 'nozzle' in each carb mouth. Simples. Peter Peter. Where in North wales are you?Just curious as you say your 30mins from 97 ron fuel. Do you have an Esso service station near that has Super unleaded. I can check what refinery feeds it and let you know if its Ethanol free Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Cobbold Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Peter, does this helps? http://www.vehicular.isy.liu.se/Publications/PhD/99_PhD_580_LE.pdf I own a Saab 96 and are member of the Dutch Saab forum. It's an ongoing discussion on the forum - more or less an academic one... I didn't find a thread about a working 'specimen'. There's a link to the site above, especially from page 95 and on, I think. Since you're used reading this intelligent stuff, perhaps you use it. Menno Thanks Menno, The ionisation current is an interesting and cheap way of monitoring combustion pressure - given a background in electronics that I lack . I had seen the thesis, and noted that the WI flow rate was not quantified. But it did show that wi retards combustion as expected. I guess it needs a electronics engineer to devise a workable ionisation current detector/analyser to go any further. Peter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Cobbold Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 (edited) Peter. Where in North wales are you?Just curious as you say your 30mins from 97 ron fuel. Do you have an Esso service station near that has Super unleaded. I can check what refinery feeds it and let you know if its Ethanol free Martin, Well out in the sticks: LL21 9SN. Nearest 97 RON I know of is in either Mold ( 40 min one way) or Denbigh (30 min one way). So I'm designing the WI to let me run on 95RON ( 7min one way). Would be good to know where nearest Shell Super is, as I could go even higher on compression ! Peter. Edited December 26, 2016 by Peter Cobbold Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Don H. Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Well out in the sticks:... Nearest 97 RON I know of is ... either 40 min ... or ... 30 min one way)... Isn't that what's called a "high quality problem", Peter? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Cobbold Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Isn't that what's called a "high quality problem", Peter? Don, Or Buridan's Dilemma. Peter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Cobbold Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 I still have the DIY steam injection kit that I bought in the 70's probably from an ad in E&M. It has a water storage tank, a pump to a header tank which is mounted at the same level as the exhaust manifold, and a pair of 'steam generators' which are long bolts, drilled lenghwise through the centre and intended to be fitted through the manifold and sealed with a couple of copper washers. Never fitted it and keep it near to tbe Smiths computerised fuel display, also bought and never fitted Malcolm, Interesting...are the steam generators bolted though the exhaust manifold- if so where does the steam go ? Peter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
adriantr4 Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Hello - Water Injection ... Many years ago, my great-uncle who was a tool maker & engineer of the (very) old school told me he had built a water-injection system. He was referring back to probably the mid 60's/early 70's and I think he had Fords (Cortina? MkII?). The intention was to improve mpg, and he reckoned it did work after a fashion. I think he dripped it into the carb. He was a reader of Practical Mechanics & similar. The set-up would have been pretty rough-and-ready, but functional. regards, Adrian Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malcolm Tatton Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 Hi Peter, the idea is that the manifold is drilled (vertically if possible) and the bolts pass through. The header tank is at the same level as the manifold so the supply is constant. What I should have said is that there is a copper feed pipe which goes from the header tank, through the drillings in the bolts and up to the carbs. The level keeps the water in bolts replenished as the steam is then driven out of the top and into the carbs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Peter Cobbold Posted December 26, 2016 Report Share Posted December 26, 2016 (edited) Hi Peter, the idea is that the manifold is drilled (vertically if possible) and the bolts pass through. The header tank is at the same level as the manifold so the supply is constant. What I should have said is that there is a copper feed pipe which goes from the header tank, through the drillings in the bolts and up to the carbs. The level keeps the water in bolts replenished as the steam is then driven out of the top and into the carbs. Hi Malcolm, That's interesting. Looks to me that they are using evaporation to steam to replace a pump and atomiser. The steam may well condense back to tiny droplets in the intake manifold - the evaporating petrol will cool the charge byup to 18C. Tiny droplets will spread more equally between the runners. Water droplets that remain suspended will probably persist through the intake stroke and then evaporate during compression as the gas heats up. That helps power. WI is most helpful at full throttle - is there any form of control of the water flow? Where do the copper pipes end in the carbs- alongside the needle of the SU? Peter Edited December 26, 2016 by Peter Cobbold Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JohnG Posted December 28, 2016 Report Share Posted December 28, 2016 All Back on the premium fuel track for a minute . . I was using Shell V-Power, but, following discussions about ethanol on the forum, I switched to Esso Synergy. Now, there seems to be some support for Shell. I get confused easily. Shell V-Power Nitro or Esso Synergy? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.