Tonyloz Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 Hi all How can i mod the front end to have a bit more negative camber Thanks T Quote Link to post Share on other sites
boxofbits Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 Hi Tony Moss do an adjustable top fulcrum kit, part number as follows, but check it's the right one:- Adjustable front upper fulcrum kit . . . . . . . . . . . .200659X . . . .£146.95 However, you have to play about to get the desired camber and then weld the brackets in position to stop them moving. Depends a lot on just about everything including tyre slip angle, pressures, springs etc, but probably around -2 degrees should be enough. Much more than that and the outside of your tyres will do absolutely nothing in ordinary road use and corners, and you'll actually lose grip. Regards Kevin Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tr4Deano Posted June 1, 2016 Report Share Posted June 1, 2016 Racetorations have the best solution but you might have to sell a kidney, you can cut and mod your own upper suspension arms but you have to be patient Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted June 2, 2016 Report Share Posted June 2, 2016 Racetorations top adjustable arms http://www.racetorations.co.uk/triumphs-c56/tr2-c3/tr2-chassis-suspension-and-steering-c76/racetorations-upper-wishbones-adjustable-p425 Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TriumphV8 Posted June 3, 2016 Report Share Posted June 3, 2016 As far as I know the MOSS kit is from Bastuck where it can be bought cheaper. It works and installation is possible but it did not have my full confindence so I did not fit it. Although negative camber is a big progress on corners, especially with /80 or /70 tires, the running straight suffers. This will be even bigger when the front has the castor with 0 degrees. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ian Vincent Posted June 3, 2016 Report Share Posted June 3, 2016 Moss used to offer King pins with negative camber. They were OOS when I was at that stage in my rebuild so I opted for the Revington kit which I suspect is the same as the Bastuck kit. Fitting it was fairly straightforward. I opted for 1.25 deg of negative camber. Rgds Ian Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BlueTR3A-5EKT Posted June 3, 2016 Report Share Posted June 3, 2016 The adjustable top wishbone mount kit Revington sell is their own design and manufacture - only to be copied by the rest of the sellers to undercut the price. Yes it works better than hacking 3/8" (10mm) out the top wishbone arms as we did 40 years ago to our competition cars. Think about the Revington reduced bump steer, steering lever kit on a sidescreen car - a fabulous improvement for bump steer. My own car runs the Moss neg camber vertical posts ( the first pair comisioned that were trial items in 1989) With hindsight I would now go for the adjustable system and suffer the titting about to get it set up correct. Peter W Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tonyloz Posted June 3, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2016 Thanks for all the replies Food for thought! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lebro Posted June 5, 2016 Report Share Posted June 5, 2016 I have fitted the Bastuc adjustable upper fulcrum purchased from the TR shop. Note the kit is for a TR4 the bolts are the wrong length for TR2-3a. It took awhile to set up & I decided on 0.6 dgs -ve as just being noticeable. I think 2 degs would be too much for road use, & would look wrong. I also fitted the steering geometry kit, & the sprung top cover for steering box, & also fitted late TR4 trunnions , with TR4a-6 upper wishbones to give 3 degs castor. The effect of all of these mods is a much improved steering. Bob Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jean Posted June 7, 2016 Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 Yes Bob, I too fited the Revington kit in addition to the TR4A upper arms giving 3 deg castor etc... For an old man, the fitting of the Revington R&P makes the car drive a and steer to almost perfection..... The filosophy of Neil Revington is to not intervene on the LENGTH of the upper arms as the arc of movement is modified. By moving the inner upper mounting points the circle of rotation remains as it originaly was. My brain might be too old to understand it all... hello Mr Alsheimer.....but for that reason I tend to consult the experts.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Drewmotty Posted June 7, 2016 Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 By moving the fulcrum in and up and retaining the original wishbone length the virtual roll centre is much improved. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
YOW500 Posted November 2, 2016 Report Share Posted November 2, 2016 Hi Bob. PM sent. Russell Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lebro Posted November 2, 2016 Report Share Posted November 2, 2016 Answered. Bob. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.