Jump to content

Fuel Injection


Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...

I remember happy days occasionally marshalling and watching the Bevan and Fraser Imps giving the Minis a good workout back in the '70s. A few of my work colleagues also rallied Imps which went against the general trend and certainly required a different driving style and considerable nerve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My granfather was George Bevan, to celebrate the 40 th anniversary of the championship wins my father an I built a final Bevan Imp. The car was sold this January to a chap in Scotland.

 

I run a car restoration business which specialises in E-types, however a friend has commissioned us to build a TR4 which is now in the process of being built. The car is actually a US spec car with a Tr4a chassis etc although it has the solid rear axle.

 

It really is lovely and has grabbed everyone's attention, I am trying to build a standard looking car which has performance upgrades.

 

I will post a few pictures when from work.

 

Jonathan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you look at the Moss supercharger kit? That would seem to be bolt on performance without the electrickery. Moss Motors TR2-4A Supercharger Information Video - YouTube http://www.mossmotors.com/forum/forums/thread/24337.aspx My experience was Hogan's TR4 with a supercharger that was a bit limp until I worked out, made and fitted the correct sized supercharger pulley - It went like fury, till the supercharger seized due to no lubrication. NOTE - That was NOT a Moss supercharger. No doubt others with experience will comment. Cheers Peter W

Edited by BlueTR3A-5EKT
Link to post
Share on other sites

Try Emerald EFI as he has a kit for TR2-7 (Dave Walker) phone no 01953 889110 his ECU is built like military top class kit. Nice company to deal with.He has converted many E- Types and is well known in their circles. I am just a satisfied customer.

Regards HarryTR5 Nutter :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

True for a 6 but it is do able on a 4.

Stuart.

 

 

MMmm, Moss Europe list it for a 6 pot (250/ TR5 & 6) but don't list it for RHD UK market TR 2/3/4/4a ........so have to get it shipped via ebay :ph34r:

Looking at the photo, looks as if the Air filter assembly would foul, so whats the mod Stuart ?

 

(NB: Webers are £2000 cheaper :blink: )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont know Mike as I have never been down that route but there have been several sidescreen cars fitted with Judson superchargers over the years including one down here.

Stuart.

Picture of an Australian installation.

TR3.sc.1small.jpg

 

and an Australian TR4

TR4.Fr.JPG

Edited by stuart
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont know Mike as I have never been down that route but there have been several sidescreen cars fitted with Judson superchargers over the years including one down here.

Stuart.

Picture of an Australian installation And an Australian TR4

 

Stuart

 

Just heard back from Moss Technical, you're right of course. The kit will fit RHD cars and they are amending the website (at time of going to press they hadn't tested so excluded, now have, all OK)

Edited by North London Mike
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you look at the Moss supercharger kit? That would seem to be bolt on performance without the electrickery. Moss Motors TR2-4A Supercharger Information Video - YouTube http://www.mossmotors.com/forum/forums/thread/24337.aspx My experience was Hogan's TR4 with a supercharger that was a bit limp until I worked out, made and fitted the correct sized supercharger pulley - It went like fury, till the supercharger seized due to no lubrication. NOTE - That was NOT a Moss supercharger. No doubt others with experience will comment. Cheers Peter W

 

================================================================================================================

Yes, supercharging is brilliant for road cars, but the MSA penalty killed supercharging for racing.

Moss kits seem to be tuned for quite low max.boost, to run safe with normal CR heads. But lower the CR and spin theblower faster to 10psi and....yes, terrific.

Edited by Peter Cobbold
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

================================================================================================================

Yes, supercharging is brilliant for road cars, but the MSA penalty killed supercharging for racing.

Moss kits seem to be tuned for quite low max.boost, to run safe with normal CR heads. But lower the CR and spin theblower faster to 10psi and....yes, terrific.

 

Peter

 

You're obviously the 'go to' source for S/C conversions. Showing my ignorance here, why lower compression if higher boost, what's the relationship?

I know some of the kits come with different pulley's which increase the boost :ph34r:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike asked: "why lower compression if higher boost, what's the relationship?"

 

Mike,

Nutshell summary.

A supercharged engine has effectively a variable compresson ratio.

The CR/boost relationship is ultimately dictated by fuel octane and onset of detonation. So if we have very high octane fuel ( eg methanol. ethanol) then a high geometricCR head can be used with high boost. Turbo Subarus in USA are running 30psi boost on E85 - and the knock sensors dont trigger!!

But on UK's best petrol, 97-98RON, the onset of detonation will occur at much lower boosts, The boost/CR relationship cannot be predicted precisely as detonation is a complex flame behaviour. It depends upon fuel RON, combustion chamber shape, spark timing, mixture (never ever go lean!), turbulence, and especially the heating of the mixture produced by the blower, and etc.

A very rough rule of thumb is that every 3 to 4 psi boost needs geometricCR to be lowered by 1 ratio. So if a TR head is safe normally aspirated on 97RON at geometricCR=10.5 then running 10 psi boost would need CR reduced to about 8. There are tricks to use a bit more boost such as retarding the spark under higher boosts, intercooling ( only with fuel injection) water injection, fuel dope.

The detonation risk is highest at peak torque around 3000rpm and falls at higher rpm. So Moss' 6psi max boost at 5500rpm corresponds roughly to adding 1 CR ratio at peak torque, which would be tolerated on a 9.5 geometricCR head. I suspect a lot of the expense in the kit was effort spent on matching the boost to the head and in being certain that detonation is unlikely. Bad detonation can hole pistons in seconds.

Supercharging for road use - brief burst of boost - allows pistons etc to cool down at cruise. For racing the heat build-up is much more challenging, and intercooling essential, as well as the best, coolest compressor. Thats why vintagents at VSCC use methanol fuel - its high RON and evaporative cooling eliminates detonation.

cheers

Peter

Edited by Peter Cobbold
Link to post
Share on other sites

Peter

 

Thanks for that (I think :blink: ) So, if the standard kit is 5-6 PSi boost on a standard head, and they claim 30-40% increase in power/ torque then we would need to reduce the CR by 1 to be able to run 10psi which your text indicates is the place to be.

 

However, I assume the gain Vs boost graph isn't a linear progression, i.e. if 5 psi boost gives you 30% boost, 10psi won't give you 60% increase (or will it ?)

 

So what is the likely gain vs the extra stresses on the engine and the head work involved in the CR reduction if we go to 10psi boost ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike,

 

If you had the supercharger actuated via an electric clutch (as per your a/c in the Jag), for short bursts as Peter says "Supercharging for road use - brief burst of boost - allows pistons etc to cool down at cruise" no head work needed? I suspect that off boost the power will be well down though......

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mikes

The extra power/torque over and above the atmospheric power curve will be roughly linear with boost. That's only very roughly, as blowers raise the temperature of the mixture more at higher boosts, which reduces the air density- meaning some of that 10psi is due to higher temperature not air.

 

re Moss kit. Never having seen the spec on the kit I dont know exactly whats on offer. I'd be surprised if the kit info doesnt mention safe boost/CR range. The Eaton M62 blower they use will certainly be capable of flowing 10psi at 5500rpm.

 

Declutching the blower is used on moderns to kill its horse power loss (maybe 1 to 2 hp) when the engine is at cruise, an economy measure. Detonation will hole a piston in very few seconds at wide open throttle so killing boost is best done by lifting off immediately its heard. Problem is, detonation can be inaudible at full chat with roof down...the first sign can be blue smoke pumping out the exhaust and catch tank. So tuning to ensure detonation is 'impossible' is safest. Start with low CR and work up? The TR6 low CR USA heads are ideal for that, but I guess TR4 had no really low CR heads? So shorter pistons?

I know off two TR3s being supercharged in UK at present - perhaps they can advise.

 

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.