Graham Robson Posted December 18, 2017 Report Share Posted December 18, 2017 Well, if you got the registration number right - it should be HKV 20 - matters might not be as confusing .... Hon. Pres. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BlueTR3A-5EKT Posted December 20, 2017 Report Share Posted December 20, 2017 Not the TR7 deviant (derived) TRX then? http://www.aronline.co.uk/concepts/concepts-and-prototypes/iad-trx-concept/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TomMull Posted December 20, 2017 Report Share Posted December 20, 2017 Hi gents, just saw in German forum that the TRX prototype is for sale: http://www.triumphtrx.webspace.virginmedia.com I do not have any clue about price and where she is releted in Germany. BR Marcus I believe it was listed with Hemmings a year or so ago for $95,000 US. Tom Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BrianC Posted December 20, 2017 Report Share Posted December 20, 2017 I believe it was listed with Hemmings a year or so ago for $95,000 US. Tom They'd have to pay me a lot more than that to give it garage space. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rhino_mac Posted December 20, 2017 Report Share Posted December 20, 2017 They'd have to pay me a lot more than that to give it garage space. I don't think Triumph would have had Pininfarina quaking in their boots would they? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Alec Pringle Posted December 20, 2017 Report Share Posted December 20, 2017 The TRX did not usually photograph well, that's for sure, but it looked a great deal more acceptable in the metal, going back to the days when John Ward owned the cars . . . . . . I was amazed at just how much better the car looked for real rather than on paper. That's more than 40 years ago now. Cheers Alec Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RogerH Posted December 20, 2017 Report Share Posted December 20, 2017 Perhaps I'm odd but I think it is quite a decent car. Considering the year and the market, ST tried hard to get something special. Over complicated for sure but they were looking into the future. It needs to be rebuilt simply to get it living again. I'd have it if it wasn't so expensive. Roger Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BrianC Posted December 21, 2017 Report Share Posted December 21, 2017 I saw it often in the early 70s when I joined the TRR and although it was in good condition, I simply thought it looked hideous, was over-complicated and the antithesis of the TR range at the time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rogerguzzi Posted December 21, 2017 Report Share Posted December 21, 2017 Hello All 2 photos from Archers Shirley 50th Anniversary 1928 - 1976 Roger Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted December 22, 2017 Report Share Posted December 22, 2017 Hello All 2 photos from Archers Shirley 50th Anniversary 1928 - 1976 Roger I see the Fury had a different reg no then. Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.