Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Now I've got your attention !

 

Been reading the various posts about improving the front suspension on early TR's, & got to thinking that it would probably be a good idea to improve my '3.

 

I want to stick with the original steering box as I don't find it too heavy, and it is a good one with not much play.

I have steel 4½" rims with 165R80 radial tyres.

I'm thinking alter camber angle to 0° to improve the look of the car, & to improve cornering ability.

Alter castor angle to whatever the later cars are 3° is it? to improve the self centering of steering.

Fit the Revington sprung peg to the steering box, & the replacement peg & bushes for the centre tie rod to further reduce steering slop.

Possibly fit the "reduce bump steer" kit (longer outer tie rods, & special steering arms) from Revington.

 

I don't particularly want to adjust the camber angle, just make it 0°

 

So question is do I just get all from Revington (quite expensive), or would I be better off using standard (later car) parts where appropriate.

Edited by Lebro
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had the Revington ssuspension package on my 3A for about 25000km now and it makes me more enthusiastic about it every time I drive it. I fitted it to replace a clapped out original arrangement and also fitted R & P steering. The result is better roadhlding, bump steer is eliminated and the steering even self centers. This may be a touch too modern for some.......

As for cost, you pays yer money and you makes yer choice. Neil spent a lot of time developing his suspension packages and has proved them with his hand on experience, as have his customers. There aren't many suppliers around where you can buy something that has been properly tried and tested by the outfit that sells it to you ? But that comes at a price,

It would seem to me to be a mistake to buy the parts here and there just because they were cheaper.

 

FYI before going over to R&P steering, I too fitted the spring loaded peg to the original steering box and also the bronze (?) Delrin bushes. This helped a lot to tighten things up but if the bronze bushes lasted well , the spring loaded peg only puts off the day of reckoning. In my experience once the worm begins to wear there is not a lot will stop it.

 

 

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob, I'm very much thinking the same, I have the Box top and centre bushes, these made a dramatic improvement. I also swapped out the idler arm for a better original, mine can only be described as routed!. I believe Revingtons do a nice bushed version which might also be worth considering. As regards reducing the bumps steer with the new arms Peter W's analysis and feedback was very positive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that both James & Iain.

 

My steering box is actually pretty good as they go, & I can see how the sprung peg, along with bushed pivots on the centre arm could improve things further. I am sceptical about replacing the idler, because I think it would have to be extremely sloppy before it makes any difference.

I have (this afternoon) been reading up on exactly what needs to be changed, & was surprised to read that the early vertical links can be retained. I had always thought that on the later cars one of the links (& trunnion) were the opposite thread direction. Not sure where I got that from though.

 

Anyway - still in the planning stage. Watch this space !

 

Bob.

 

P.S. James do you still have the sprung peg & bushed pins ? if so could they be for sale ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

TR4s use the same vertical links as the side screen cars together with 3 degree trunnions and TR4a/6 top wishbones.

TR4a onward uses a beefed up vertical link with left hand thread on one side and right hand thread on the other. These later vertical links have the stub axle about an inch higher relative to the trunnion pivot bolt and so will lower the car by that amount if fitted to an earlier car.

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andrew.

So, it sounds as if I may not need the adjustable upper fulcrum, but instead use TR6 type upper wishbones on my existing fulcrum, together with the TR4 3° trunnions. would that give me 0° camber ?

 

Bob.

Edited by Lebro
Link to post
Share on other sites

TR6 upper wishbones are the same length as the ones fitted to TR3s but offset towards the rear of the car to take account of the 3 degrees castor. They wont alter the camber.

As I understand it the adjustable fulcrum has a 12mm higher axis to help with the roll centre and camber gain. A 12mm spacer under a standard fulcrum will pull the camber in about 1 degree to +1 degree but the other one or two degrees you need for a road car with radial tyres (maybe 0 to -1 degrees) will need the sliding adjustment or shortened arms.

The adjustable fulcrum also spaces the top arms out a bit wider leaving room for shims each side of the ball joint so that the arms can be assembled without any strain on the vertical link.

Revington has thought about it more than a bit :)

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not a big fan of the brass bushes on the centre link and prefer the Moss Delrin bushes instead.

Stuart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe OGB was Neil's test bed for his suspension package. Others can list out the techy bits and the spec etc but from the driving seat, it's hugely effective and I can only repeat James' comments except that OGB still has the steering box but with the sprung peg. I've wondered about R&P steering but once moving (5.5" rims) everyting lightens up and is just so positive and predictable with loads of feedback.

 

Recomend it

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting - I would have thought brass would last longer & be more precise ?

 

Bob.

You probably dont want the race car feel do you?

Stuart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm probably not, so how do the delrin type work, is the delrin simply a replacement for the rubber part of the original type, only the pin can rotate in the delrin ? I would not have thought that there was much give in the delrin. ?

 

Have not ordered anything yet, so just trying to make sure I get what I need.

 

Plan so far:

 

Adjustable front upper fulcrum kit TR2-6
Lower trunnion Late TR4 133838 (RH )
Lower trunnion Late TR4 133839 (LH )
Top ball joint Late TR4 - 6 GSJ131 X 2
Upper wishbone rear Late TR4-6 133507 X 2 Second hand OK
Upper wishbone front Late TR4-6 133504 X 2 Second hand OK
Steering geometry kit
Sprung peg mod for steering box
Replacement central tie rod pivots - brass or delrin ?
I'm happy that my steering box is a good un (very little play)
Also that my vertical links are good
Steering idler is a tiny bit loose on the thread, but no where near enough to make any difference to the position of NS wheel

 

Bob.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are correct in your assumption of how they work, they just dont transmit like brass does being harder. The old trick to refresh the idler was grind the body down a tad so you can screw it in one more turn onto unworn threads.

Stuart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.