PGB BME Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 Hi Looking at my tr250 (LHD) the clutch master cyl sits along side the servo on the face of the LH bulkhead, looking at some rhd conversions the clutch master cyl then sits on top of the RH bulkhead with the servo on the face, is this correct for a conversion, why isnt it a simple mirror image? Advice photos please Regards Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 The reason for it being on the top on R/hand drive cars is clearance for manifolds on the TR5 PI as no 250`s were produced in R/hand drive. But as your converting you would also find clearance problem for the rear carb. Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PGB BME Posted December 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 Stuart Thanks for the explanation. I'll carry on with it on top, all the best for 2018 Regards Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Fremont Posted December 31, 2017 Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 P.I. or Webers in the scheme ? Full license since it's neither / nor now . Cheers, Tom Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PGB BME Posted December 31, 2017 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2017 Tom Won't be PI because I don't want it to seem as though I'm turning into a TR5. Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grafton Posted January 3, 2018 Report Share Posted January 3, 2018 This my 250 conversion as I brought it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PGB BME Posted January 4, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 Grafton Thanks for the photo, my question was based on the TR250 retaining the carb set up, for originality, yes if PI is added then the master cyl would have to be on top. I suppose by putting it on top it covers all eventualities. Again many thanks for the photo, Stuart thanks for your initial comment. Regards Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 Grafton Thanks for the photo, my question was based on the TR250 retaining the carb set up, for originality, yes if PI is added then the master cyl would have to be on top. I suppose by putting it on top it covers all eventualities. Again many thanks for the photo, Stuart thanks for your initial comment. Regards Phil As you can see there isnt a lot of clearance and difficult to check level/fill so TBH I would go for the top position. Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 This my 250 conversion as I brought it Looks like your Vacuum hose is quite restricted BTW. Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PGB BME Posted January 4, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 Stuart Thanks for the comment, my bodywork man has now converted it to the top position. Regards Phil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Flinn Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 Are you sure its proper Servo Hose? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 Are you sure its proper Servo Hose? Its actually a type of semi reinforced fuel hose by the looks of it. Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grafton Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 Just been bleeding the brakes after changing the flexible hoses for braided ones it's where I put brake fluided bottle as for checking fluid levels in clutch master cyclinder not to much of a problem but I agree it's all a bit tight Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Fremont Posted January 4, 2018 Report Share Posted January 4, 2018 if PI is added then the master cyl would have to be on top. I suppose by putting it on top it covers all eventualities. Phil Or DCOEs, for that matter Cheers, Tom Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.