Jump to content

roger murray-evans

TR Register Members
  • Content Count

    406
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by roger murray-evans

  1. 8 minutes ago, Ian Vincent said:

    And on the same theme, Vincent Paccellieri, who has a 1953 TR2, participated in the LBL Rally last year.  I have his contact details (mobile number) if it is any help.

    Rgds Ian

    Hi Ian,

    Thanks for the input and I'll get in touch for the contact details after exhausting the

    current leads. It's a fact that every TR2 made in 1953 would have/should have the 

    early pipe and a few in January 1954 too.

    Means there could be a meaningful market for every surviving TR2 before

    TS413 except TS1LO which does seem to have a pipe of the correct configuration as shown in the

    restoration booklet.

     

    Roger M-E

  2. 3 hours ago, james christie said:

    I’d be a bit wary of using unused old stock rubber parts, even for purposes of authenticity. Rubber has a limited shelf life, whether its hoses or tyres

    james

    James, thanks for your interest, but in this particular case, the rubber hoses are/will be

    fresh made of normal straight pipes.

    Roger M-E

     

  3. 1 hour ago, ianc said:

    Response from Ian Gibson:

    Quite early on both the steel pipe and the two hoses with identical part numbers were listed in the "Old World Supersessions List" as replaced by the two identical bent hoses (108422) and the pretty straight  steel pipe we know (108423).  Although those entries do not make it clear that you'd have to substitute all three parts at the same time!!

    I think it rather doubtful if I have an example of 201795 but the only place it might be (if I do have one) is in a large box of early NOS parts in the loft.  There should be a full list in the box so I'll have a look after Xmas.

    I'm sure that pipe will have the same bore as the later one 'cos it has to match the water pump housing which never changed.

    I'll ask my USA contacts if anyone out there still has an original pipe (though being mild steel then survival to 2020 looks unlikely to me!!).  It'll give them something to think about over Christmas!!

    Thanks for doing that Ian and hope Ian G has something for the New Year!

    Best wishes

    Roger M-E

  4. 1 hour ago, BlueTR3A-5EKT said:

    I have never seen one, but we did have samples of the straight rubber hoses at C&B.

    Lateral thinking here.

    Fit engine and radiator.

    Install the later two curved hoses with the link tube between and clamp all up nice and tight.

    Take the assembly to an exhaust pipe bender and ask them to reproduce it exactly in the right sized metal tube.  

    Cut off the short sections each end you do not want and fit straight rubber hoses to connect to radiator.

    Might work.

    Peter W

    Hi Pete,

    Yes, that was always going to be the default should an original not be available.

    I've got Fastroad in Ashford in sight should a pattern not be available.In that

    eventuality I will take the car there sans front apron and have it made to fit the

    car to be sure, to be sure!

    Roger M-E

     

  5. Hi Roger!

    Good suggestions Roger, and I do have a Phase 1 Vanguard and ST parts book,

    and did a google of TE20 retailers but both use a long rubber pipe for the

    connection.I presume the TR item it was discontinued on a cost basis as

    easier to mmake a nearly straight steel pipe and 2 bent rubber pipes than a

    steel pipe bent in 2 planes and straight rubber?

    I do have an idea as to what it should look like, (same profile as the later set up with

    both bent rubber pipes attached) but I'm hoping a survivor lurks out there

    to be duplicated exactly as per.Can't imagine many still in use somehow, so maybe

    a future project.The TR2 Survivors list shows a potential circa 100 cars still in existance,

    within that Commission number spread so could be a very small lurking need.

    Roger

     

     

  6. Does anyone have any details of the dimensions of this item,

    fitted to TS1-TS413 under part #201795.It's the predecessor to

    the slightly kinked steel pipe connecting the water pump to the

    bottom hose on the radiator fitted to all sidescreen TRs, TS414

    onwards (p/n 108423).The early item has straight rubber hose

    connections,the bends being formed as part of the  steel pipe.

    Perhaps the TRR has a pattern?

    Roger M-E

  7. 13 hours ago, David Owen said:

    Just a note to let people know that I ordered something from the UK on Thursday and it arrived today.

    DHL people.  There is no substitute for international shipping.

    This is particularly directed at a well known parts company that needs to work on it's customer service.

     

  8. Hi Rob,

    Yup, I always hit the Enter when I think I've gone far enough! I've just done as you suggested and, low and behold, it goes down the one line only, so that seems to be the answer!

    It seems strange that it only behaves in that fashion on this forum.When composing emails or other composition on my desktop it (the CR or Enter) only takes me down the one line.

    However, you have hit the right button as far as this phenomenon is concerned, so many thanks for you help.

    Cheers

    Roger M-E

     

     

     

  9. Mick,

    I'm thinking you're not a huge fan of 'museum grade cars'?

    You come across as being a little contemptuous for those who want no more

    from their old cars than to drive them around "purely for pleasure", fiddle

    with them and try to keep them close to the original concept?

    I'd like to take small issue with your comment " The whole ethos of sports cars

    in the day was race it Sunday, go to work in it on Monday".

    Such an observation may have had some relevance to the avid reader

    of Motor Sport or other period motoring magazines, but a perusal of the

    entry lists into the various motor sporting categories will elicit that the entries

    were made up of the same tiny cohort of drivers, that did in fact own,

    perhaps a TR2, for the purposes of Sunday racing/Monday work.But they

    they would have made up a very small percentage of the total number of, say,  TR2 drivers.

    UK sales 2800 odd.10 percent would seem an unlikely number.But a possibility.

    The same would apply to MG, Jaguar, Austin Healey etc.The vast majority of sports

    car drivers were just that. Sports car drivers!

    I'm not really sure what to read into your inclusion of the TRAction letter from Alec Pringle,

    which I didn't find particularly enlightening, but which appears to be his conjecture into the

    circumstances of a rather horrible accident to a close friend in a TR4A, and which obviously and

    understandably caused him some considerable anguish.

    Not everyone buys an old car with the intention of entertaining his/her children or grandchildren.

    Selfish I may be, but the last thing on my mind when contemplating the acquisition of yet another old

    banger is, how long will the kids be kept riveted in awe of the prospect of an outing in Dad/Grandads

    old car, before they disappear in the direction of an Ipad or a football.

    Cheers

    Roger M-E

     

  10. Graham,

    I would agree that some of the contributors to this and other forums do get

    rather carried away with the 'safety' advice. This can lead one to make changes

    to an historic piece of equipment which, if used in the manner for which it was

    originally intended and is maintained to a reasonable standard and driven by a

    reasonably intelligent driver, doesn't really justify any great changes to it's original

    spec.I fully agree that fitting a roll over bar, 4 point racing harness, radial tyres, not

    to mention vented disc brakes, will perhaps make you 'safer' in the event of an incident,

    but having all the aforementioned upgrades (as they are labelled) will generally ensure

    your arrival at the said incident at a greater pace than you might have intended, whilst

    giving a degree of comfort that all will be well on impact.

    It's all a matter of choice of course.What anyone does with their property is their own

    business, but it does seem a shame to make changes for the sake of them in my personal opinion.

    I wish you the best of luck with your project and very much look forward to seeing things as they

    move forward!

    Cheers

    Roger M-E   

  11. Graham,

    I know you've already acquired the car, but did you consider getting a slightly later

    TR3, already with disc brakes as standard, but retaining the good looks of the

    TR2?.Just seems a shame to modify, what is a shrinking resource, into a clone of

    a later model made in much greater  numbers.Most certainly disc brakes are superior,

    but drums, unless you are going to be driving the car at it's limits all the time, are perfectly

    adequate for all normal usage, and even the occasional competitive  event.

    TR2s were much raced and rallied in period and were very successful.

    Remember, there were around 4 times as many TR3/As with discs versus drum braked TR2s,

    and that ratio has no doubt  increased over the years.

    Your chance to buck the trend!

     

    Roger M-E

     

  12. Bob,

    Be careful with the Max rods.Due to the big end caps being

    divided horizontally across the centre of the rod, the rod is just a little bit

    wider at the top of the stroke or was in my case.

    All of mine, ever so slightly, nicked the bottom of the liners, on gentle rotation

    by hand, causing a half moon chunk to get knocked off the bottom of

    the liners.Not the end of the world, as its the very bottom of

    the liners where they protrude below the block spigot and can be ground to give the

    necessary clearance.

    Triumph rods being divided on the diagonal of course, don't have this potential problem as

    the angled bolt bosses reduce the width of the rod.

    Good luck

    Roger M-E

  13. Having already received my pair of these from Ian in the last day or so, and having

    trial fitted them I am very pleased to say that they come highly recommended in

    terms of quality of manufacture and fit.The plating is very good, and being on brass

    should have a long life.They also, of course, shift your early TR2 into the area where

    it is easily identifiable for what it is, if that is important to you.

    Well done to the SDF, and especially to Ianc for expediting their availabilty!

    Roger M-E

  14. I've experienced similar problems over the years on different cars.Everything is super and then the pedal disappears or

    goes spongy especially after a period of inactivity. It has usually been an air leak at the  one of the various banjos or the copper sealing washers for the banjos,at various points around the braking system.They let in a miniscule amount of air as opposed to obviously leaking fluid,over varying periods of time.As Roger has asked, if you are getting air bubbles from any of the wheel cylinders (other than the air already present) you may wish to tweak the banjo bolt if fitted or replace/anneal the copper washer to restore theseal.

    Good luck. Not always easy to track down!

    Roger M-E

  15. On 9/13/2020 at 6:04 PM, NCS_TR3A said:

    Take it from someone who makes glass, that's not a glass back window. I think it's just the term they have used rather than trying to mislead. 

    Neil

    I quote from 'Original Triumph TR' by Bill Piggott

    P117 Hard-top kit "Both types usually had perspex rear windows, but some glass ones exist"

    By both types Bill means both glassfibre and steel hardtops.

    Roger M-E

  16. On 8/29/2020 at 8:31 AM, Ralph Whitaker said:

    To give you some idea, my late 60 3a has an EB number 1987 lower than the commission number, and these were the original plates still in situ on the American import when I bought it.

    Also had engine no 278 lower than commission number.

    No body number was recorded in the factory records (according to Heritage Certificate), so I assume the factory did not place much importance on it, probably just used for internal reference until the commission no had been allocated.

    Ralph.

    Ralph,

    I might be barking up the wrong tree here, but weren't the engine numbers generally higher than the comm numbers, due

    to engines supplies being  made available to other users such as Morgan, Swallow ect?

    Roger M-E

  17. I've found many instances of 'incorrect' fitting of coils, esp. to pos earth cars

    where the coil is marked cb/sw and presumably the maker of said coils is

    oblivious to the fact that not all cars are neg.earth.

    In my personal experience it hasn't made the slightest discernible difference

    which way around it's wired.I do though, now I've picked up a bit of knowledge ,

    try and and connect up the 'correct' way.

    Roger M-E

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.