Jump to content

barkerwilliams

TR Register Members
  • Content Count

    2,429
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by barkerwilliams

  1. Peter,

     

    I found this very interesting and enlightening. Might I please ask a combustion question I have often pondered.

     

    Combustion results in a conversion into a number of product gases that occupy a larger volume at atmospheric pressure than the original air / fuel mixture exerting an increased pressure in the combustion chamber.

     

    As the combustion is exothermic those gases are heated and expand and exert an even greater pressure in the combustion chamber.

     

    My question is what proportion of the power of an engine is related to the conversion of the AF mixture and what proportion is related to the expansion of the products of combustion by the heat.

     

    Apologies for my simplistic grammar.

     

     

    Alan

  2. I too would be interested in these. Two of my injector pipes have rubbed the underside of the bonnet, and have bonnet paint on the injector pipe. It is not a problem now, but I would not like a perforated fuel line above the exhaust manifold so I was thinking of something like these clips to hold the pipes closer to the rocker cover, away from the bonnet. So if anyone knows of a useful part I would be happy to hear from them.

  3. John,

     

    Could not agree more with your post. I started this thread because I do not understand what supply is needed for the rocker shaft. there is mention of roll pins in the external feed pipe, or other restrictors such as proposed above. But there seems to be no target supply to aim for. The internal camshaft supply pulses oil to the rocker shaft for perhaps 60 degrees of camshaft rotation, crudely this is about 1/6th of the oil supply from the external additional pipe and furthermore it will always pulse oil at the same point in camshaft revolution when one or two valves are working their hardest - the rest of the valves will have to take their chance on the reservoir effect of the rocker shaft and feed pipes. The original design is more or less (depending on who you believe) good enough for the rockers. So why is the additional pipe capable of delivering 6 or more times that quantity of oil? There may be additional flow from the external pipe due to pipe diameter considerations.

     

    So I was asking if a camshaft manufacturer had adjusted the camshaft to increase the rocker oil feed so that an external pipe would not be needed. But it seems not.

     

    TR owners seems split between leave it original, and fit the external pipe, I would like to be a little bit better informed before I commit permanently .

     

    I am now fabricating a fitting to measure the oil pressure (second temporary gauge) at the head bolt where the second pipe attaches together with a needle valve in the external additional oil pipe. I can then measure the "original pressure" with the pipe shut off and then all points to full bore on the external pipe. In the workshop with the rocker cover off perhaps I can determine what appears to be a good supply to the rockers and measure that pressure. I will then probably leave the needle valve in the external oil pipe.

     

    It might lead nowhere but I am trying to proceed on the basis of some sort of factual results.

  4. Reading all the contributors above and many other similar topics there seems to be a general consensus that the additional rocker feed pipe delivers too much oil, and that the original design, whilst effective on an engine in good condition probably supplies only just enough to the rockers, not quite enough if upgraded to roller rockers.

     

    Is there any information out there on what any rocker assembly needs in any other make or type of engine, is it 10ml per thousand revs, or 1 litre per thousand revs?

     

    Contributors above suggest that a modification to the camshaft would be relatively easy and could be engineered to produce any particular oil flow required, if only there was an oil flow target to aim for.

     

    Most oil flow in an engine is cooling, just a percentage for lubrication, is the rocker problem one of cooling, or lubrication?

  5. Andreas,

     

    many thanks for your answer. Yes I now have roller rockers, hence the oil pipe. But there is so much controversy whether an external pipe is needed, or even damaging to the lower engine. As I am vaguely planning a bottom end rebuild I was wondering if a cam manufacturer had improved the feed up to the rocker shaft.

     

    From your answer that would seem to be very easy to achieve on a camshaft swap. Not as easy as fitting the external pipe though; so I presume the external pipe is for expediency when swapping rockers.

     

     

    Alan

  6. If you cannot find an original idle air valve then internet search for "needle valve bass" you will find something suitable.

     

    You try http://www.tech-hose.co.uk/browse_product.aspx?mode=level4&level5=30758&level4=30754&level3=30748&level2=30639&level1=30246&stockistown=False

     

    Where a possibly suitable valve is < £15. You could either thread the throttle body to take the valve or file down/of the threads of the new valve to about 0.48" when it will push fit like the original.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.