Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just been going through my draw of air line fittings ( yes seriously) and made a discovery, using a precision measuring gauge, a drill bit,  the hole in the 'male' fitting is 3/16 of an inch there or there abouts no matter what the diameter of the air line  the fitting is supposed to go on. 

Question is there any benefit in drilling the hole out bigger to improve air delivery volume ? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Graham,

if you make the hole bigger you will make the valve weaker :o

Regarding the airflow.  Over a short length you will not reduce the flow that much comparing 3/16 and 1/4. 

If it was a long pipe like a garden hose then the length comes into play and you would reduce flow.

The mechanical strength is probably more important than the very slight flow reduction.

Stay as is.

 

Roger

Link to post
Share on other sites

Airlines on assembly lines are normally 1/2 ins but where high powered airtools are used like 1 ins drive impact tools or multi head tools then 3/4 ins airlines are usually specified. A normal garage compressor would not provide sufficient cfm at 90psi to feed the 3/4 line so a 1/2 ins line with standard quick connectors would feed most garage tools. If you increase the size of the compressor and the working pressure/cfm  then more air can pass through the same hose. Roger is right  as with an airline only about 20ft long there will be no benefit. 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over here there are 2 types, the “euro” type is an optimized design with larger bore for same hose size.

Waldi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked and the Euro fitting I have is 1/4 internal bore, but think I will leave the PCL fittings I have alone as opinions would say that  there wouldn't be any significant improvement in performance, and to Rogers point my Grandfather used to be head of engineering at a large industrial plant in West London in the 50's and when he turned up they were using Pneumatic pressure testing after seeing the results of a few explosive failures he insisted that they changed to hydraulic pressure testing with the failures being less spectacular ! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.