Jump to content

Head ID Help Required Please


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

On behalf of a member who is not tech savvy ( am I??!!! ),  he has asked if we can help identify the head in the attached photos - it came as spare parts with his TR3 acquisition - it appears to have been professionally refurbished so he was hoping to use it on the engine he is building.

However, when he tried to fit a low port exhaust manifold ( which is definitely correct), it doesn't line up properly with the studs, so the question is, what head is this- vanguard?

The casting number in the top corner of the head is 305679  and a further number, 511151, is stamped on the top machined edge of the manifold side of the head,

Hopefully photos attached will help   Cheers Rich

1569836751_image3(3).png.12a156db0a8240bffe598c366bbee2d8.png1702045167_image2(6).png.6de1a23f90d07d237de9a1a0ff3f5044.png162925766_image1(18).png.c317fe92d697874b787ae223c01ba7f5.png  

Edited by rcreweread
remove duplicated photo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Diddy widdy little 7/16 th stud holes, flat area between studs 2 and 3 all inlet and exhaust holes are in line and round - Vanguard.

Mick Richards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Rich,

I think that the circular ports tend towards it being a Vanguard.

I have a head sitting on the floor of my workshop looking at me every time I go in there.

It has circular ports.

It came from a Vanguard engine I bought a few years ago, thinking it was the same as a TR. (Only cost £15, so not a problem…)

The holes for the cylinder head studs are a smaller diameter to that of the TR, so it would not just “Drop on”. I’m also sure that most people would not recommend it even if it could.

However…

Many (many, many) years ago I bought a scrap TR3 for parts.

I could never really understand why the head (a genuine TR item) seemed to be able to “Float” about a bit when dropped onto the block.

Reason was that the actual engine was a Vanguard, and the head was a TR.

Maybe that is the case with your friends TR.

One give away with the Vanguard block is that the dipstick hole is towards the rear of the car. The TR block had the dipstick at the front.

Both cars have the casting with a “Lump” cast in for either dipstick; only the actually drilling of the “Lump” tells you which block it came from.

Hope that helps a bit.

Charlie.

 

Arrrgh...

I type too slow...

Mick beat me to it.

(But still check the block !!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/19/2019 at 7:55 PM, Charlie D said:

Hello Rich,

I think that the circular ports tend towards it being a Vanguard.

I have a head sitting on the floor of my workshop looking at me every time I go in there.

It has circular ports.

It came from a Vanguard engine I bought a few years ago, thinking it was the same as a TR. (Only cost £15, so not a problem…)

The holes for the cylinder head studs are a smaller diameter to that of the TR, so it would not just “Drop on”. I’m also sure that most people would not recommend it even if it could.

However…

Many (many, many) years ago I bought a scrap TR3 for parts.

I could never really understand why the head (a genuine TR item) seemed to be able to “Float” about a bit when dropped onto the block.

Reason was that the actual engine was a Vanguard, and the head was a TR.

Maybe that is the case with your friends TR.

One give away with the Vanguard block is that the dipstick hole is towards the rear of the car. The TR block had the dipstick at the front.

Both cars have the casting with a “Lump” cast in for either dipstick; only the actually drilling of the “Lump” tells you which block it came from.

Hope that helps a bit.

Charlie.

 

Arrrgh...

I type too slow...

Mick beat me to it.

(But still check the block !!!)

In the interests of historical accuracy, SOME Vanguards had the rear mounted dipsticks

and SOME have them at the front as per TRs. 

Roger M-E

Link to post
Share on other sites

Charlie, You can be and are forgiven!

Unfortunately, errors do find their way into the best of publications, usually

because the author has accepted a 'known' truth and put it into print.

I wouldn't have argued the point either had I not got a Phase 1 Vanguard

(Late 1950), still with it's original engine and having the dipstick at the forward

position and no rear boss for alternative dipstick position.

.I also have a spare Vanguard engine which has the dipstick at the rear but also has

the undrilled boss at the front.

My attached photos show (1) My Ph1 Vanguard 1950 Front d/stick no rear alternative boss

(2) 1958 TR3 Block Front d/stick and alternative rear boss

and (3) my spare Vanguard engine (year unresearched) Rear dipstick and alternative front boss.

It's a can of worms!

Roger M-E

 

DSCN4991.JPG

DSCN4993.JPG

DSCN4994.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.