Adie TR3A Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 Just returned to TR's after selling my TR 4 (john Weedon now runs it) with a late 1957 TR3A . It's an ex USA car advertised by the dealer as a 3 but the registrar confirmed what i thought, it was a very early 3A ( did not tell dealer of course!). I imported it back end of 2018 and it's the usual DRY STATE car, if so why am i fitting new floors, sills etc!! Question for you all: One thing that looked good on all the photo's of the car prior to buying it were the door gaps, wing fits etc. From contacting the previous owner its sat around for years before he sold it to a dealer and a lot of the paint appears to be original. When i started on the repairs to the tub first, i found that the door to B post gaps were good because the B post edges have been lead loaded ( a devil to remove the residue to weld new metal to original) under what i believe is the original paint. As i removed the rear wings i found this practice had been continued in the area around the rear lights and down where the rear panel meets the lower rear wing. Was this the practice on the production line in the 50's at Triumph, in those cash strapped times would not have thought so?? Any thoughts anyone regards Adrian Quote Link to post Share on other sites
John Morrison Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 Certainly around the back panel, rear wing tops, and I guess wherever else deemed needed. Got to remember it was the method of the day. think MK 1 and 2 Jags. John. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 There was always lots of lead used for panel fit back in those days and FWIW Ford still used it up to the end of MK5 Cortina production. Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
j-eichert Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 My neighbor worked at Opel's main factory in Ruesselsheim/ Germany - so a "sister" to Vauxhall" and part of the GM family.His first job was a plumber, than he changed in to the car industry for the money… they placed some pounds of lead onto the bodys in those days, closing gaps, straightening surfaces etc. So I think you can be sure that this was "from factory" Later restaurations tend to use bondo Regards, Johannes Quote Link to post Share on other sites
boxofbits Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 BMC / BL also used it. Both my Morris Minor vans have been leaded on the van back front/top panel section joins just behind the cab roof, from the factory, to conceal the spot welded joints. And these are not upper market vehicles! Kevin Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Adie TR3A Posted January 15, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 Thanks to all who replied so quickly, looks like it is original production line process then. Intend to have shell dipped when panel work finished on the shell , have to find out if this removes the lead work regards Adrian Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ian Vincent Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 (edited) Just to add my bit, my 1959 TR3a had lead loading around the B pillar along the door shut face and there was also some on the front scuttle. All of it original. Rgds Ian Edited January 15, 2019 by Ian Vincent Correction Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted January 15, 2019 Report Share Posted January 15, 2019 2 hours ago, Adie TR3A said: Thanks to all who replied so quickly, looks like it is original production line process then. Intend to have shell dipped when panel work finished on the shell , have to find out if this removes the lead work regards Adrian It will Im afraid, same would go for blasting too. Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.