Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Now most of our cars are MOT exempt when would be the better time to have a voluntary one done.

Now so that any remedial work can be done over winter or in the spring when most remedial works have been done

and you can start the season with a fresh ticket and knowledge that any unknown problems from jobs done over winter have been picked up.

Just something to think about

Brian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most Classic insurances are limited mileage, what better than a recent  MOT certificate to corroborate a mileage reading for the insurance company.

So for me a couple of weeks before insurance renewal. Two birds, one stone.

Alan 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I simply MoT my classics shortly before the old certificate is due to expire. The idea of an annual professional check on the quality of my maintenance work gives peace of mind, just in case I missed something.

Each to their own...

Nigel

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked at the DVLA site and my interpretation is that provided your car is registered historic and is ok according to the originality rules you dont need to get a MOT and you can if you like dip in and out and still get one done whenever you like. I assume if it fails it fails and will be tested under the new rules maybe?.

My Mot runs out this month, but I will be getting my test done in the spring as its in the garage for the winter and I will be working on it during that time. Seems to make sense to me to get done after I worked on it.

Roger

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get it done when it expires! Crazy to exempt & to rely on the Government to know what is best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two ways of looking at this dilemma, should you test before you start work on car to help determine what needs doing, or should you not trust your own work and test after completion to confirm all is OK?Or

both! 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, ChrisR-4A said:

Two ways of looking at this dilemma, should you test before you start work on car to help determine what needs doing, or should you not trust your own work and test after completion to confirm all is OK?Or

both! 

Chris

Prior to my recent jaunt around France  I did a huge amount of fettling and then it went for the MOT  to check all was ok and highlight what wasn’t before it bit my bum and I ended up on a Rally with no wife and no navigator!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris

I don't think it's about not trusting the work I do.  I have been working on cars since I was seventeen 49 years in total. It just makes sense to me. The car will be in the garage whilst I work on it and when I am finished I will take to MoT station. 

Roger

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sound right Chris.

An MOT is money and time well spent, I believe.  I imagine one would need to be sure that it is as rigorous as that carried out on cars with a statutory requirement.  Ideal, I guess, would be a TR specialist offering that service because they would have a vested interest, over and above their professionalism, which is a given, namely the remedial work! That would be fine with me; I'd want to drive with reasonable confidence in the car's safety.

Of course, no MOT inspection could have foreseen the forthcoming snapped con rod which took out a sizeable piece of the block, as I sped (love that old word) down the autobahn in my '72 TR6.  We are now an hour or so into the  armistice anniversary day, and I am reminded that a motorist, who followed me as I found my way to the hard shoulder, said of my envelopment in black smoke, " Ja, you looked like the Red Baron being shot down."  My car, Ellie, was eventually repatriated to Goudhurst, (that's another saga) where my young nephew, a Haynes guide and I, installed a brand new half engine purchased from Loxley's at Bromley.  I also popped on a metering unit and new injectors, the first of two during my 28 years tenure of the Pimento Princess Ellie, WVX 545L. 

Curiously, and quite irrelevant to this thread, a similar event, this time on an autoroute, befell my BMW motorbike (a straight 4) about twenty years later. Again, I survived without injury as metal flew like shrapnel. (Ellie was snug in her garage at the time)

 I paid the irate French farmer driver £150 cash for the shrapnel hole in his elderly car's door - we were both very lucky with our legs - and other bits!  - The European break down cover paid for a hotel and then got me home to Wandsworth and the bike to BMW Service, then at Chiswick, on the Monday. BMW picked up the £5.8k tab for the repairs on my  bike. Quite a weekend "spin".

The French car?  Probably rotting in a barn with a shrapnel hole in its door surrounded by £150 worth of, now empty, wine bottles.

Cheers!

Brendan

 

Edited by EXTR6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.