Jump to content

Very early lockheed axle.


Recommended Posts

A bit of confusion here, and not for the first time!

After studying the Moss catalogue I am none the wiser about whether there should be brake shoe retaining springs. The back plates do not seem to have a provision for this, do they stay in position with good luck and the bent tab beside the wheel cylinder holding the lower spring?

The Stanpart parts catalogue early addition does not show this an error or particular to the Lockheed axle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My backing plates (early 56 TR3) had provision for springs but none came with car. I added some after much debate. Here is a link (https://photos.app.goo.gl/EJWNt4m6SDWmXVVs8) to a picture of my backing plate showing part number and spring attachment point. Also page from parts catalogue showing how parts changed over time. Yellow mark shows wear I was worried about in case springs were causing issue after installation. Cheers, Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.