Bill Bourne Posted April 18, 2018 Report Share Posted April 18, 2018 (edited) Not sure it's my eyes but the reversing lights are not in the same position both sides, in saying that you couldn't build one for that money. Nick Yep I think you are right.. The o/s is further to the right than the n/s. Also the boot rack doesn't seem to be sitting straight. It looks to be higher on the n/s above the number plate fixing, than the o/s. It's easy to criticise as these are difficult and very time consuming to get right. I would guess that none were absolutely spot on every where. I know from my own re-build you will have to compromise. Best Bill Edited April 18, 2018 by Bill Bourne Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stuart Posted April 18, 2018 Report Share Posted April 18, 2018 Poor repro rear wings and thats not a "New" chassis. Stuart. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
boxofbits Posted April 18, 2018 Report Share Posted April 18, 2018 It also looks like the rear ride height is too high and giving the rear wheels a touch of the Triumph Herald positive camber. All things mentioned including Stuarts observation concerning the rear wings add up to mark this car down a peg or two. It looks a typical high street classic car dealer example to me. Id rather buy an original unrestored car needing a lot of work. Kevin Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulmoto Posted April 18, 2018 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2018 Again thanks for all your excellent advise and information, P Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.