Jump to content

Recommended Posts

While covering myself in waxoyl yesterday, I noticed that the offside bracket (on wishbone) for the anti roll bar is not looking great and needs replaced. A couple of questions:

 

1. If I drive the car and it gives way, is it likely to do any damage?

2. When I replace the bracket, is there any tension on the bar? Is it better done jacked up or sitting on the ground?

3. 'Everyone' seems to think poly bushes are the way forward. Is now the moment to fit some to the ARB and will they really make any difference in this area?

 

Thanks as always for your comments

 

Ali

 

post-12841-0-74605500-1412598459_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

While covering myself in waxoyl yesterday, I noticed that the offside bracket (on wishbone) for the anti roll bar is not looking great and needs replaced.

 

Sway bar is an accessory, not an original part and after a while all brackets tend to twist that way. I'm inclined to believe that it's just its "matured" shape.

 

A couple of questions:

 

1. If I drive the car and it gives way, is it likely to do any damage? NO

2. When I replace the bracket, is there any tension on the bar? Is it better done jacked up or sitting on the ground? NO tension but it's always easier to work with a jack

3. 'Everyone' seems to think poly bushes are the way forward. Is now the moment to fit some to the ARB and will they really make any difference in this area? No idea but I doubt you would feel any difference as some can hardly feel the difference with and without the sway bar

 

Thanks as always for your comments

 

Ali

 

attachicon.gifARB bracket.jpg

Edited by Geko
Link to post
Share on other sites

In a bend that compresses the spring on the other side the damaged end of the arb will rise, and the wheel alongside it will droop. It will not stay in the position in your photo.So I would not drive if its likely to break.

It will be moreorless solid when you try to disconnect it if the other wheel is on the ground. Chassis on blocks, and jack under each wheel gives you precise control of the arb.

Wear in the bushes on the chassis will not help antiroll bar function. So the less play the better on all its bushes.

Peter

Edited by Peter Cobbold
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the ARB seems to be too long at its ends and putting the links constantly under load hence twisting the brackets. One way to relieve that load would be by changing the angle of the link through adding shims behind the front clamps (or blocks as above) so as to bring the ARB forward

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bracket is most likely to give way in a corner, as that's when a bending load is being applied. Under such conditions, the sudden loss of the ARB's restraint could land you in real difficulty and you might leave the road. So, fix the bracket, or remove the ARB until you can get the bracket fixed.

 

If both wheels are at the same level with respect to the chassis, there is no tension in the ARB.

 

Polybushes (or nylon, if you are competing seriously) are a very good idea - far superior to rubber, which is likely to wear out quite rapidly (same goes for the wishbone bushes).

 

Ian Cornish

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm. Now I am getting nervous, as I am supposed to go for a run out on Wednesday with a bunch of like-minded folk, over some quite bendy narrow roads! Sounds like I might be better taking it off. I am not sure how strong the brackets are.

 

I see Moss do an uprated ball joint link as well. Anyone any experience of this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A front arb normally promotes understeer. So without it the car might be a little bit less likely to find a hedge bonnet first.

You'll probably find a liitle more roll in corners but I doubt its going to cause alarming oversteer. ( unless you have a rear arb).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm. Now I am getting nervous, as I am supposed to go for a run out on Wednesday with a bunch of like-minded folk, over some quite bendy narrow roads! Sounds like I might be better taking it off. I am not sure how strong the brackets are.

 

I see Moss do an uprated ball joint link as well. Anyone any experience of this?

 

Don't worry, there's always an apocalyptic scenario around the bend but bottom line is: you judge.

 

Re uprated links: I got my ARB second hand with twisted brackets like yours and worn out ball joint links. Looking at the setup I found that the original links were too long and with the wrong angle hence causing the brackets to twist. So I went to my accessory shop and choose shorter links (Toyota if I remember well) with wider base and including locking washers that would spread the load on the surface of the bracket, then I put the brackets in the vise and straightened them up and that was it. It's been on for a couple of months and there's no sign of overload on the links and brackets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's something I'm puzzling with: I see you have minilites. 6"? with which tire width? Asking this because your pic seems to show that the tire is rubbing against the ARB...

post-11469-0-00736900-1412629144_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the length of the vertical link will just alter the attitude of the whole ARB rather than bend the bracket? After all its the same length both sides. Could this be the result of grounding the bar on some obstruction, like a kerb or speed cushion for instance ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the length of the vertical link will just alter the attitude of the whole ARB rather than bend the bracket? After all its the same length both sides.

Yes, if no torsion is involved. Under torsion the longer the link the more concentrated force will pass through it before being dampened by the bush and reaching the ARB (imagine filling a syringe through the needle) hence the higher the chances of twisting the bracket because 1/ the force is not dampened by a bush on the wishbone and 2/ the bracket can't withstand torsion the same way the ARB does

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I don't buy that explanation. There is no extra force here just because the drop link is longer (the moment does not change with length because it is just transmitting force axially) and the components should have been sized to take the force that torque in the ARB produces so the bracket should be able to take it.

 

However, if you are talking about the standoff distance of the vertical link from the bracket, yes that will be a factor - except that the other side which was seeing equal-and-opposite force did not bend?

 

This still looks like impact damage to me.

Edited by RobH
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but I don't buy that explanation. There is no extra force here just because the drop link is longer (the moment does not change with length because it is just transmitting force axially) and the components should have been sized to take the force that torque in the ARB produces so the bracket should be able to take it.

 

I guess that's what the discussion is about. I argue that the bracket is simply not strong enough to withstand that force because 1/ it is not dampened and 2/ the length of the link delays the transmission of the force from the wishbone to the ARB and acts like a bottle neck. I'm saying that the shorter and the thicker the link, the faster the force is transmitted to the ARB. An example could be the use of an electric relay to boost the power supply: the relay "shortens" the link. Part of the problem is also the positioning of the bracket on the edge of the wishbone witch is far from ideal....

 

However, if you are talking about the standoff distance of the vertical link from the bracket, yes that will be a factor - except that the other side which was seeing equal-and-opposite force did not bend?

 

This still looks like impact damage to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's something I'm puzzling with: I see you have minilites. 6"? with which tire width? Asking this because your pic seems to show that the tire is rubbing against the ARB...

I am impressed by your forensic abilities from such a small photo. Having had another squint underneath, the tyres on both sides are rubbing the ARB. There is an identical mark on the nearside of the bar as well - photo attached.

 

I am not sure what size the rims are: they are marked 15J. The tyres are 185/65R15.

 

Excuse my ignorance but is there an easy fix for this i.e. a stop on the steering or spacers on the wheels???

 

Impact damage could be a possibility as the front clamps have clearly had a close encounter with something hard. As it is LHD it may be that it hit a pothole on the side of the road with previous owner.post-12841-0-56888900-1412681743_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be a steering stop bolted to the trunnion, part number 142403. It might be missing. Also the original was drilled off centre but the repros seem to be centre drilled which means they don't work particularly well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pete. I will have a look. I see the part number has changed to 156111 in my Moss catalogue.

 

Presumably there is not a lot of adjustment if it is just drilled off-centre??

Rotate it so the 'fat' side is facing a trunnion pad to get least lock, on both side of the car. It does make a difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to see a problem solved. You could probably temporarily put a set screw and some washers in there. Sorry about the part number confusion, I was working from the original S-T parts book.

Edited by peejay4A
Link to post
Share on other sites

TR`s up to mid way through TR4 production had the eccentric stop, after it was changed to non eccentric. I believe only Revingtons offer the eccentric type. It is also worth checking the back of the disc for score marks from the split pin in the end of the trunnion bolt.

Stuart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poly bushes on the anti-roll bar made a !@#$%! racket on my '250; I replaced the A-arm bushings ( with rubber ) thinking the noise originated there but no joy. When I did finally discover the culprit the only lubricant which silenced them was anti-seize compound ( silver type with stainless steel powder ).

 

I don't race mine ( on the track, that is ), so I don't recommend the poly type. Rubber gets the job done fine and doesn't snap, crackle and pop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.