Jump to content

Engine mods - fuel consumption


Recommended Posts

Hi all, I continue to enjoy my recently purchased CR series TR6 with overdrive, but I'm worried about the fuel consumption. The engine has the folllowing upgrades:

1) Stage 3 head.

2) Fast road cam.

3) Extractor exhaust manifold.

4) Performance twin exhaust system.

5) K&N air filter.

 

I'm getting through a worrying amount of fuel and perhaps at the moment I'm enjoying these engine mods a bit too much, however, once I start to ease up on the throttle application etc, can anybody speak from experience regarding the expected MPG for town work and on a run.

 

 

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Nick

 

Well with a brand new engine in bog standard CP spec. Pottering around very low 20's sometimes teens when ya boot it at traffic lights. With the back end squating. and on a good motorway run around 34mpg. Par for coause with these monsters.

 

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Nick,

 

My suggestion are, buy a good AFR gauge, a MTX-L 3844 from Innovate Motorsports or something equivalent, I am sure your metering unit can improved for economy and performance.

That is why I work on the ECU controlled metering unit.

Good luck,

Rien

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine with a 2700 CC engine, stage 2 head, electronic ignition phoenix exhaust manifold revotec fan etc etc just rebuilt and set up on a rolling road is averaging 22mpg, probably 18 mpg worst. This seems about what you would expect. HP is in the 170s. 0 to 60 7.5. Very noisy exhaust and bags of torque. David.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mines got Kent TH5 cam Racetorations grp rad fairing for good airflow. Flamethrower coil,Prestige overhead linkage. Bosch pump bigger tank outlet, bigger wiring to pump with relay. Magnecor ignition leads' Re set metering unit. CR throttle bodies. Very big bore exhaust.Uprated distributor. Uprated oil pressure switch. K and N filter Vernier timing and ARP con rod and head bolts. Little bits that add up to a reasonable but sound mid range engine. Strange thing is though the suspension is lowered, with red springs, and with rear telescopics it still has rubber bushes, new in 1998. I will do the bushes and a solid rack mount next year, if I dont get bored with TRs and buy a Fairey Spearfish which I have promised myself. David

High fuel use could be many things, from as little as a leak, Why not get the engine tuned and set up. Lots of high power use can lead to single figure fuel use in 6 cyl TRs I know from experiance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ditch the cam, youve put in a cam that was not designed for that engine,

lousey tick over, poor fuel consumption. noisey

it will soon need changing any way. followers wearing out soon. cam lobes following.

 

you can get more hp out of a late type cam than most of the after market cams upto 280 degrees

with no massive great big hole in the T curve as well.

and alot better fuel consumtion too. better idle quieter

then spend some time, getting the fueling and ign right on a RR,

whose operator knows what he doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cam seems OK. Tick over is smooth, well balanced butterflies really help. Fuel consumption at 22 is in the expected range. Engine is quiet and smooth. All set up on rolling road. As my other note the problem is the fuel pump. Once I am happy with this it will be very good for a TR6. It is somebody else who has fuel consumption problems. David.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even when new most owners were in the teens when about town but you should get mid to high twenties if on a steady run (a lot less with Webers)check your vacum to the metering unit, it depends on good vacum it should be about 8 to 10Hg tickover on a PI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even when new most owners were in the teens when about town but you should get mid to high twenties if on a steady run (a lot less with Webers)check your vacum to the metering unit, it depends on good vacum it should be about 8 to 10Hg tickover on a PI

 

 

30 mpg can be done with Webers, get your facts right

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fairly standard late-ish TR6 (only had exhaust replaced and a K&N filter) I got teens in town and about 26 +/- on the open highway. In the UK this was motorway at an indicated 80-some. In New Zealand it was at an indicated 65-70 (tickets tended to come fairly frequently at anything over 65!).

 

Edit:

This was also with an O/D box and a 3.45 diff

Edited by Mike Goldthorpe
Link to post
Share on other sites

My attention was drawn to an advert for a honda jazz, and was surprised to see that the 1.4cc engine produced as much performance as a tr6 and gives 47mpg.

 

Obviously a misprint.

 

Lots of differences and 40 years' global R&D help drive down consumption. Weight, frontal area, rolling resistance and in engine: max rpm, CR, breathing, combustion chamber turbulence, efi spark and fuelling control.....etc etc. Amazing really that both cars depend ultimately upon the same chemistry - burning petrol. The TR6 doesn't do it terribly well by modern standards. But the TR has the big advantage that we can repair it ourselves when things go wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the TR has the big advantage that we can repair it ourselves when things go wrong.

 

 

Hallelujah to that.... :)

 

Cheers

 

Tony

Edited by Tony Millward
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delay in replying Nick P, problems with Windows on the computer.

Hope the pics upload OK when I finally sort out how to get them on!.

 

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/anschutz2/6966655695/" title="TR Manifolds 001 by Anschutz2, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7187/6966655695_ff4592949a.jpg" width="375" height="500" alt="TR Manifolds 001"></a>

 

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/anschutz2/6966656421/" title="TR Manifolds 004 by Anschutz2, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7064/6966656421_30ffccbd62.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="TR Manifolds 004"></a>

Edited by Anschutz
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delay in replying Nick P, problems with Windows on the computer.

Hope the pics upload OK when I finally sort out how to get them on!.

 

<a href="http://www.flickr.co...tz2/6966655695/" title="TR Manifolds 001 by Anschutz2, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticf..._ff4592949a.jpg" width="375" height="500" alt="TR Manifolds 001"></a>

 

<a href="http://www.flickr.co...tz2/6966656421/" title="TR Manifolds 004 by Anschutz2, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticf..._30ffccbd62.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="TR Manifolds 004"></a>

 

 

Is the blue hose just connected to a vacuum gauge or do you have it have it connected to the advance on the distributor?

 

Thanks

 

Simon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goes to a normal car vacuum gauge such as http://www.speedogra...ial_offers.html although you sometimes find black dial gauges on ebay etc. Also when working vacuum will not be as good as if fitted to carbs.

Black gauge http://thegaugeshop.com/shop/category_8/VACUUM-GAUGES.html?shop_param=cid%3D%26

If you do get one that needs a refurb use http://www.jdo10.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ Excellent service and good price.

Edited by Anschutz
Link to post
Share on other sites

30 mpg can be done with Webers, get your facts right

 

 

Webers can't have been set up right!

 

Nick P,

Before Anschutz gets back - a vacuum guage! AKA an economy gauge.

EG http://www.ebay.co.u...=item3f1354fe7b

T-piece in the vacuum line to the M/u, mount dial temporarily on the dash.

See:

 

John

PS Don't be like the guy in the video - driving and filming at the same time!

PPS Oh! Anschutzs is back - anyway!

Edited by john.r.davies
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the blue hose just connected to a vacuum gauge or do you have it have it connected to the advance on the distributor?

 

Thanks

 

Simon.

 

The blue hose take-off is on the inlet valve side of the closed butterfly. A better site for supplying the vacadv capsule is opposite the throttle edge when it is open about one fifth of its swing, at the top. The vacuum is greater at cruise and it wont advance the spark at tickover. A driiling though the steel sleeve just at the outer edge of the aluminium is about right, although a small nick will be needed in the rubber plenum hose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.