Jump to content

Mystery Gearbox Lever


Recommended Posts

One good thing about retirement is that I have time to investigate minute details. Here is a screen shot from the "Jabbeke" 50 year Anniversary film produced by the TR folks in Belgium. This is a TR3A, driven by a woman. Does anyone know what is the extra lever at the bottom of the normal gearbox remote control? I apologize for the poor quality of the screen capture.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your mystery gear box is equiped with a MANUAL overdrive, some of them have been produced by the Belgium factory IMPERIA (at the same time as the coupé Francorchamps) I join some photos of the gearbox with its manual overdrive.... there was one for sale on e-bay few weeks ago.

Rgds

GG (www.trmentvotre.com)

 

 

 

One good thing about retirement is that I have time to investigate minute details. Here is a screen shot from the "Jabbeke" 50 year Anniversary film produced by the TR folks in Belgium. This is a TR3A, driven by a woman. Does anyone know what is the extra lever at the bottom of the normal gearbox remote control? I apologize for the poor quality of the screen capture.

 

Thanks

post-5266-1250183102_thumb.jpg

post-5266-1250183117_thumb.jpg

post-5266-1250183132_thumb.jpg

post-5266-1250183102_thumb.jpg

post-5266-1250183117_thumb.jpg

post-5266-1250183132_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

One wonders what was the cost of all that metalwork against the switch, relay, isolator switches, solenoid and a few extra wires of the arrangement with which most of us are familiar. And, how does one guarantee that overdrive has been disengaged before reversing - a reliance on memory? I cannot see any sign of an interlock, although it would be possible, I suppose, to have something to prevent the reverse gear selector shaft sliding forward as long as overdrive remains engaged.

Ian Cornish

Link to post
Share on other sites
One wonders what was the cost of all that metalwork against the switch, relay, isolator switches, solenoid and a few extra wires of the arrangement with which most of us are familiar. And, how does one guarantee that overdrive has been disengaged before reversing - a reliance on memory? I cannot see any sign of an interlock, although it would be possible, I suppose, to have something to prevent the reverse gear selector shaft sliding forward as long as overdrive remains engaged.

Ian Cornish

 

 

Ian,

 

In the second and third pictures you can see a tab of metal to the right and ahead of the overdrive lever that would prevent you moving the gear lever into reverse position unless the overdrive lever is pulled back.

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In the second and third pictures you can see a tab of metal to the right and ahead of the overdrive lever that would prevent you moving the gear lever into reverse position unless the overdrive lever is pulled back.
Nick,in looking at those pictures, is it possible that moving the "main" gear lever into reverse would mechanically force the overdrive lever back to it's "off" position?
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only seen this one 'in real life' last year. Off course without a camera present... A black (with black upholstery) TR2. Originally sold in Holland (you can tell that when you see the car; it's a license plate related thing). The car had two levers, just like the ones on the photo's. The upholstery had been cut away for a good fit. I don't remember a second rubber grommet. I think that most TR Francorchamps had this layout.

 

Menno

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are several TR2's with the manual o/d in the Belgium TR Register. These o/d were in fact only fitted to cars assembled at Nessonvaux by Imperia and at o/d available for all forward gears. As correctly mentioned a small lip on the upper bracket prevented engagement when selecting reverse gear. A closeup taken in a friend's garage

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all too easy to underestimate the experience and expertise of the Imperia company. Imperia wasn't just a bunch of guys bolting together CKD kits. Once designers and manufacturers of luxury cars, in the latter 30s producers of Adler based fwd cars Imperia even got as far as experimenting with 4wd saloons. They were also designers and manufacturers of machine tools. Then there was the association with Minerva, and indirectly Voisin, and Hotchkiss Amilcar. That's a lot of engineering background.

 

The Imperia factory was utilised by REME after the liberation of Belgium, as was that of Minerva, which may explain Sir John Black's enthusiasm for coming to an agreement with Imperia in 1946, regardless of Imperia's plans for the Hotchkiss engined small and medium sized cars of their own. OK, initially the Standard 8s and 14s were little more than re-badged Coventry products, but from the start of Vanguard assembly in 1948 Imperia rapidly developed along parallel lines. Production was more than just Vanguards, just about all the various Triumph and Standard models were assembled by Imperia, with greater or lesser degrees of their own input, from 1947 until the opening of S-T's own factory at Malines in 1958.

 

Laycock overdrive was optional on most Imperia built cars, and standard on some, and offered as both electric or mechanical operation to choice. Clearly they were all too well aware of the reputation of Lucas, Prince of Darkness. Construction of the mechanical system was doubtless a piece of cake, given their engineering resources; and the TR system a lot simpler than that of the Vanguard Nessonvaux Cabriolet, column shift mechanically-actuated overdrive.

 

The speculations already aired are correct - the engagement of reverse automatically knocked the o/d lever out, on floor and column shifts alike. There was even an experimental 'logic control' system, I presume intended for competition use, which disengaged overdrive on upshifts, developed for both mechanical and electrical actuation.

 

Imperia were responsible for a whole variety of innovations on S-T vehicles, and I can't help wondering how much of this was testing the water on behalf of S-T, or Black preferring to prototype experiments in Belgium ? Perhaps Graham Robson might have some insights ?

 

Cheers,

 

Alec

Link to post
Share on other sites
It's all too easy to underestimate the experience and expertise of the Imperia company. Imperia wasn't just a bunch of guys bolting together CKD kits. Once designers and manufacturers of luxury cars, in the latter 30s producers of Adler based fwd cars Imperia even got as far as experimenting with 4wd saloons. They were also designers and manufacturers of machine tools. Then there was the association with Minerva, and indirectly Voisin, and Hotchkiss Amilcar. That's a lot of engineering background.

 

The Imperia factory was utilised by REME after the liberation of Belgium, as was that of Minerva, which may explain Sir John Black's enthusiasm for coming to an agreement with Imperia in 1946, regardless of Imperia's plans for the Hotchkiss engined small and medium sized cars of their own. OK, initially the Standard 8s and 14s were little more than re-badged Coventry products, but from the start of Vanguard assembly in 1948 Imperia rapidly developed along parallel lines. Production was more than just Vanguards, just about all the various Triumph and Standard models were assembled by Imperia, with greater or lesser degrees of their own input, from 1947 until the opening of S-T's own factory at Malines in 1958.

 

Laycock overdrive was optional on most Imperia built cars, and standard on some, and offered as both electric or mechanical operation to choice. Clearly they were all too well aware of the reputation of Lucas, Prince of Darkness. Construction of the mechanical system was doubtless a piece of cake, given their engineering resources; and the TR system a lot simpler than that of the Vanguard Nessonvaux Cabriolet, column shift mechanically-actuated overdrive.

 

The speculations already aired are correct - the engagement of reverse automatically knocked the o/d lever out, on floor and column shifts alike. There was even an experimental 'logic control' system, I presume intended for competition use, which disengaged overdrive on upshifts, developed for both mechanical and electrical actuation.

 

Imperia were responsible for a whole variety of innovations on S-T vehicles, and I can't help wondering how much of this was testing the water on behalf of S-T, or Black preferring to prototype experiments in Belgium ? Perhaps Graham Robson might have some insights ?

 

Cheers,

 

Alec

 

Alec: Many thanks for your excellent input!

 

Frank

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brian,

 

Up too early, old man!

Leslie Welch - yes.

Your boyhead! Forgot to put the hood down, eh?! :lol:

 

Ian Cornish

Doh!! Yes - could do with more sleep but Lynda's still working so I'm getting up at the old time of 5:30'ish. Eyes and typing fingers not fully awake even after a couple of hours :huh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an exellent book available about the Imperia history and all the cars they built or assembled, unfortunately it's only in french.

In the picture under the name of the factory you can spot the part of the lumber test track that was for about 25 percent located on roof of the factory :unsure:

An interesting fact is that in the 20th they did built a 4stroke engine without valves, the cylinder walls had an integrated vertically sliding part with slots that functioned as valves.

This sliding parts were controlled by camshafts in the bottom part of the engine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please familiarise yourself with our Terms and Conditions. By using this site, you agree to the following: Terms of Use.